Stephen Curry's 46-point performance against the Spurs was a much-needed win for the Warriors, who had been struggling with a 5-2 record. But here's where it gets controversial: Curry's dominance overshadowed Victor Wembanyama's triple-double, which included 31 points, 14 rebounds, and 10 assists. Wembanyama's achievement was the fourth of his young career, and it sparked a discussion about the balance of power in the NBA. Curry's second half was a sight to behold, with 22 points, 5 field goals, 3 three-pointers, and 9 free throws. This was the 43rd quarter of his career with 20 or more points, the most since 1997-98. But is Curry's performance enough to silence the critics who doubt the Warriors' ability to compete with the league's top teams? And this is the part most people miss: the Warriors' win was also a result of strategic coaching moves, including the removal of Jonathan Kuminga and Brandin Podziemski from the starting lineup and the insertion of Moses Moody and Will Richard. The new starting five had a -1 rating in 9:17 of action, while the old starting five with Kuminga and Podz had a +8 rating in 2:43. So, who do you think had the bigger impact on the Warriors' win: Curry's scoring prowess or the strategic coaching moves? Comment below and let us know!
