Gary Oldman’s relationship with The Fifth Element is as complex as the film itself—and trust me, that’s saying something. Here’s the shocking truth: despite delivering one of his most iconic performances, Oldman has never been a fan of the 1997 sci-fi classic. But why? And has time softened his stance? Let’s dive into the fascinating—and slightly controversial—story behind his feelings for this cult favorite.
With a career spanning decades and countless memorable roles, from Jim Gordon in The Dark Knight trilogy to his Oscar-winning portrayal of Winston Churchill in Darkest Hour, Oldman is no stranger to leaving a mark on cinema. Yet, for many fans, his role as the eccentric villain Zorg in The Fifth Element stands out as one of his most unforgettable performances. Directed by Luc Besson and starring Bruce Willis as the reluctant hero Korben Dallas, the film is set in the distant future of 2257 and follows a taxi driver tasked with saving humanity alongside a mysterious young woman named Leeloo, played by Milla Jovovich. It’s a wild ride, and Oldman’s over-the-top portrayal of Zorg—complete with a wacky Southern accent, a bizarre haircut, and a rubbery costume—is a highlight for many.
But here’s where it gets controversial: Despite the film’s enduring popularity, Oldman has never been particularly fond of it. In a 2014 interview with Playboy, he bluntly stated, ‘Oh no, I can’t bear it.’ Ouch. So, what gives? Was it the hours spent in the makeup chair? The uncomfortable costume? Or something deeper?
Turns out, Oldman’s involvement in The Fifth Element wasn’t exactly a labor of love. At the time, he was directing his own film, Nil by Mouth, and took a break from that project to join Besson’s sci-fi extravaganza. As he explained in an interview, ‘I took something like eight weeks off from my film, shaved my head again, wore a funny plastic helmet with a bit of hair hanging off it, and false teeth, and a scar, and a limp, and rubber.’ Sounds like a blast, right? Not so much. Oldman’s discomfort with the experience is palpable, even though he acknowledged the film’s ‘spiritual’ themes of good triumphing over evil.
And this is the part most people miss: Oldman only took the role as a favor to Besson, who had helped him secure financing for Nil by Mouth. ‘I was singing for my supper,’ Oldman admitted. Besson confirmed this in a 2017 interview, framing it as a collaboration between friends. But let’s be real—was Oldman truly ‘happy’ to do it, or was it more of an obligation? The answer seems clear.
Fast forward to today, and Oldman’s feelings have softened—slightly. In a recent podcast appearance, he admitted that he’d ‘probably stick around’ if watching the film with his wife, Gisele, who has convinced him it’s better than he initially thought. Still, he can’t shake the ‘contamination’ of his own experience. ‘I get a little triggered when I see it,’ he confessed, recalling the uncomfortable costume and haircut. Even Bruce Willis reportedly hated his orange vest in the film—so Oldman isn’t alone in his mixed feelings.
Here’s the real question: Can an actor’s personal discomfort with a role ever truly separate them from its impact? Oldman’s Zorg is a fan favorite, but for him, it’s a reminder of a less-than-ideal experience. Is that fair? Or should he embrace the legacy of a film that’s brought joy to so many? Let’s debate it in the comments—I want to hear your take!
Love it or hate it, The Fifth Element remains a beloved relic of ’90s sci-fi. If you’re ready to revisit this classic—or experience it for the first time—you can grab it on 4K, Blu-ray, or DVD from Amazon. Just don’t expect Gary Oldman to join your watch party anytime soon.
